SCHEDULE 14A
                                 (Rule 14a-101)(RULE 14A-101)
                     INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

                    PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)14(A)
                                     OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the Registrant [X]|X|

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]|_|

Check the appropriate box:

[ ]|_|   Preliminary Proxy Statement              [ ]|_| Confidential, for Use [X]of the
|_|   Definitive Proxy Statement                   of the Commission Only [ ](as permitted
|X|   Definitive Additional Materials              (as permitted by [ ]Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|_|   Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12


                         Rule 14a-6(e)(2))



                         AMERICAN BIO MEDICA CORPORATION
------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]|X|   No fee required.

[ ]|_|   Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

      (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

            ________________________________________________________________--------------------------------------------------------------------

      (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

            ________________________________________________________________--------------------------------------------------------------------

      (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
            pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which
            the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

            ________________________________________________________________--------------------------------------------------------------------

      (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

            ________________________________________________________________--------------------------------------------------------------------

      (5)   Total fee paid:

            ________________________________________________________________

[ ]--------------------------------------------------------------------

|_|   Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[ ]|_|   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
      Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
      paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
      number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

      (1)   Amount Previously Paid:

            __________________________________________________________________--------------------------------------------------------------------

      (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

            __________________________________________________________________--------------------------------------------------------------------

      (3)   Filing Party:

            __________________________________________________________________--------------------------------------------------------------------

      (4)   Date Filed:

            __________________________________________________________________--------------------------------------------------------------------




                         AMERICAN BIO MEDICA CORPORATION

                    NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
                            TO BE HELD JUNE 18, 200315, 2004

             TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF AMERICAN BIO MEDICA CORPORATION:

         NOTICE is hereby  given that the Annual  Meeting of  Shareholders  (the
"Annual  Meeting") of American Bio Medica  Corporation  (the  "Company") will be
held at 10:00 A.M.  on  Wednesday,Tuesday,  June 18, 200315,  2004 at the Marriott HotelHoliday Inn located at 189 Wolf Road, Albany,3
Empire Drive, Rensselaer, New York 12205,12144 for the following purposes:

         1.       To elect sevenfive directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting
                  and until their successors are duly elected; and

         2.    To ratify the reappointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the
               independent auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ended
               December 31, 2003.

         3.       To transact  such other  business as may properly  come before
                  the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

         Only  shareholders of record at the close of business on April 21, 200319, 2004
are  entitled  to  notice  of,  and  to  vote  at,  the  Annual  Meeting  or any
adjournments thereof.

         Your  attention is directed to the Proxy  Statement  accompanying  this
Notice for a more complete statement regarding matters proposed to be acted upon
at the Annual Meeting.

         All shareholders are cordially  invited to attend the Annual Meeting in
person.  However,  to assure your  representation at the Annual Meeting,  please
complete,  sign,  date  and  promptly  return  the  enclosed  proxy  card in the
postage-prepaid  envelope enclosed for that purpose.  Any shareholder  attending
the Annual  Meeting  may vote in person  even if he or she has  returned a proxy
card.

                                     BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                                     OF AMERICAN BIO MEDICA CORPORATION


                                     /s/ Edmund M Jaskiewicz
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Edmund M. Jaskiewicz/S/ MELISSA A. DECKER
                                     ----------------------------------
                                     Melissa A. Decker
                                     Corporate Secretary to the Board of Directors

Kinderhook, New York

April 9, 2003May 12, 2004

WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL  MEETING,  PLEASE  COMPLETE,  SIGN,
DATE, AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE ENCLOSED
ENVELOPE.

2



                                 PROXY STATEMENT
                                       FOR
                         ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
                         AMERICAN BIO MEDICA CORPORATION
                                 122 Smith Road
                           Kinderhook, New YorkSMITH ROAD
                           KINDERHOOK, NEW YORK 12106

General
- -------GENERAL

         This Proxy Statement is being furnished to holders of common stock, par
value $0.01 per share ("Common Shares"),  of American Bio Medica Corporation,  a
New  York  corporation  ("ABMC"  or  the  "Company"),  in  connection  with  the
solicitation  of proxies by the Board of Directors of the Company for use at the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders  (the "Annual  Meeting") to be held at 10:00 A.M.
on Wednesday,Tuesday,  June 18, 2003,15, 2004,  eastern  standard time,  and at any  adjournment or
postponement  thereof for the purpose of considering and acting upon the matters
set forth herein.  The Annual Meeting will be held at the Marriott HotelHoliday Inn located at
189 Wolf Road, Albany,8 Empire Drive,  Rensselaer,  New York 12205.12144. The Company's  principal executive
offices  are  located  at 122  Smith  Road,  Kinderhook,  New York,  12106.  The
Company's telephone number at that address is (518)-758-8158. 758-8158.

         This Proxy Statement,  the accompanying  proxy and the Company's Annual
Report on Form  10-KSB for the fiscal  year ended  December  31,  20022003 are first
being mailed to shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting on or about May 7,
2003.18,
2004.  Although the Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB  (including  audited
financial  statements)  for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 20022003 is included
with the  proxy  materials,  it  should  not be  considered  proxy  solicitation
material.

Shareholders entitled to vote; Record Date
- ------------------------------------------

         The Company has fixed the close of business on April 21, 2003 as the
record date for determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote
at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof. As of the record date, the
Company had one class of voting shares outstanding - common shares, $.01 par
value per share ("common shares"). Each common share is entitled to one vote on
each matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. As of April 9, 2003, there
were 20,609,548 outstanding common shares. No shares of preferred stock are
outstanding. For information regarding security ownership by management and by
the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company's Common Shares, see
"Security Ownership by Management and Certain Beneficial Owners."

Quorom; Required Vote
- ---------------------

         The  holders  of a  majority  of  common  shares  entitled  to vote and
represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum
for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. In general, common shares
represented  by a properly  signed and returned  proxy will be counted as common
shares  present  and  entitled  to vote at the Annual  Meeting  for  purposes of
determining a quorum,  without regard to whether the proxy reflects  abstentions
(or is left blank) or reflects a "broker  non-vote"  on a matter  (i.e.  a proxy
returned by a broker because voting  instructions have not been received and the
broker has no discretionary authority to vote). Holders of common shares are not
entitled to cumulative voting rights.

Voting
- ------

         VotingPROCEDURE FOR SUBMITTING SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

         Shareholder nominations for directors and shareholder proposals for the
next Annual Meeting of  Shareholders  must be received by attending the meeting. ACompany in writing
on or before January 14, 2005 and must otherwise comply with the requirements of
Rule 14a-8 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (the  "Exchange  Act").  The
Company has not received any shareholder may vote his or her
shares in person at theproposals for this Annual Meeting.

A shareholder planning to attend the
meeting should bring proof of identification for entrance to the meeting.





         Voting by proxy card. All shares entitled to vote and represented by
properly executed proxy cards received prior to the Annual Meeting, and not
revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions
indicated on those proxy cards. If no instructions are indicated on a properly
executed proxy card, the shares represented by that proxy card will be voted as
recommended by the Board of Directors. If any other matters are properly
presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting, including, among other
things, consideration of a motion to adjourn the Annual Meeting to another time
or place (including, without limitation, for the purpose of soliciting
additional proxies), the persons named in the enclosed proxy card and acting
thereunder generally will have discretion to vote on those matters in accordance
with their best judgment. The Company does not currently anticipate that any
other matters will be raised at the Annual Meeting.

         For the election of directors, the seven nominees who receive the most
votes will be elected to the seven available memberships on the Board. If you
return a signed proxy form or attend the Annual Meeting but choose to abstain
from voting on any proposal, you will be considered present at the Annual
Meeting and not voting in favor of the proposal. Since most proposals pass only
if they receive favorable votes from a majority of votes present at the Annual
Meeting, the fact that you are abstaining and not voting in favor of a proposal
will have the same effect as if you had voted against the proposal. (In
contrast, a "broker non-vote," where a broker withholds authority to cast a vote
as to a certain proposal, is deemed not present at the Annual Meeting with
regard to that proposal.)

         Revocability of proxy.REVOCABILITY OF PROXY.

         Any proxy card given  pursuant to this  solicitation  may be revoked by
the person giving it at any time before it is voted. A proxy card may be revoked
(1) by filing with the Secretary of the Company,  at or before the taking of the
vote at the Annual  Meeting,  a written  notice of revocation or a duly executed
proxy card, in either case later dated than the prior proxy card relating to the
same  shares,  or (2) by  attending  the  Annual  Meeting  and  voting in person
(although  attendance at the Annual  Meeting will not of itself revoke a proxy).
Any written  notice of revocation  or subsequent  proxy card must be received by
the  Secretary  of the  Company  prior to the  taking of the vote at the  Annual
Meeting.  Such written  notice of revocation or subsequent  proxy card should be
hand  delivered  to the  Secretary  of the Company or should be sent so as to be
delivered to American Bio Medica Corporation,  122 Smith Road,  Kinderhook,  New
York 12106, Attention: Corporate Secretary.


Expenses


VOTING

         Voting by attending  the  meeting.  A  shareholder  may vote his or her
shares in person at the Annual  Meeting.  A  shareholder  planning to attend the
meeting should bring proof of Solicitation
- ------------------------identification for entrance to the meeting.

         Voting by proxy card.  All shares  entitled to vote and  represented by
properly  executed  proxy cards received  prior to the Annual  Meeting,  and not
revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions
indicated on those proxy cards. If no  instructions  are indicated on a properly
executed proxy card, the shares  represented by that proxy card will be voted as
recommended  by the  Board of  Directors.  If any  other  matters  are  properly
presented  for  consideration  at the Annual  Meeting,  including,  among  other
things,  consideration of a motion to adjourn the Annual Meeting to another time
or  place  (including,   without  limitation,  for  the  purpose  of  soliciting
additional  proxies),  the persons  named in the enclosed  proxy card and acting
thereunder generally will have discretion to vote on those matters in accordance
with their best  judgment.  The Company does not currently  anticipate  that any
other matters will be raised at the Annual Meeting.

For the election of directors, the five nominees who receive the most votes will
be  elected to the five  available  memberships  on the  Board.  If you return a
signed proxy form or attend the Annual Meeting but choose to abstain from voting
on any proposal,  you will be considered  present at the Annual  Meeting and not
voting in favor of the proposal.  Since most proposals pass only if they receive
favorable votes from a majority of votes present at the Annual Meeting, the fact
that you are abstaining and not voting in favor of a proposal will have the same
effect  as if you had  voted  against  the  proposal.  (In  contrast,  a "broker
non-vote,"  where a broker  withholds  authority  to cast a vote as to a certain
proposal,  is deemed  not  present  at the Annual  Meeting  with  regard to that
proposal.)

EXPENSES OF SOLICITATION

         The  cost of the  soliciting  of  proxies  on  behalf  of the  Board of
Directors  will be borne by the  Company.  In  addition to the use of the mails,
proxies  may be  solicited  by the  directors,  officers  and  employees  of the
Company, without additional compensation,  by telephone,  other electronic means
or in  person.  Arrangements  may  also be made  with  brokerage  firms or other
custodians, nominees or fiduciaries for the forwarding of soliciting material to
the  beneficial  owners of common  shares of the Company  held of record by such
persons;  and the Company will reimburse such  respective  brokers,  custodians,
nominees and fiduciaries for the reasonable  out-of-pocket  expenses incurred by
them in  connection  therewith.  ADP has been  retained to assist in  soliciting
proxies at a fee of $5,000 plus distribution costs and other costs and expenses.

Procedure for Submitting Shareholder Proposals
- ----------------------------------------------

         Shareholder nominations for directors and shareholder proposals for the
next Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received by the Company in writing
on or before December 20, 2003 and must otherwise comply with the requirements
of Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").SHAREHOLDERS ENTITLED TO VOTE; RECORD DATE

         The  Company  has not receivedfixed the close of  business on April 19, 2004 as the
record date for determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote
at, the Annual Meeting or any shareholder proposals for thisadjournments  thereof.  As of the record date, the
Company had one class of voting  shares  outstanding - common  shares,  $.01 par
value per share ("common shares").  Each common share is entitled to one vote on
each matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.  2



SecurityAs of May 3, 2004, there were
21,282,268   outstanding  common  shares.  No  shares  of  preferred  stock  are
outstanding.  For information  regarding security ownership by management and by
the  beneficial  owners  of more than 5% of the  Company's  Common  Shares,  see
"Security Ownership ofby Management and Certain Beneficial Owners
- --------------------------------------------------------------Owners."


                                       2



SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

         As of April 9, 2003,May 3, 2004, there were 20,609,54821,282,268  common shares  outstanding of
which 20,409,54821,282,268 common shares are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting
(200,000 are common shares reserved in treasury and are not entitled to vote at
the Annual Meeting).Meeting.  Each
Common  Share is  entitled  to one vote on each of the matters to be voted on at
the Annual  Meeting.  The  following  table sets forth,  as of April 9, 2003,May 3, 2004,  the
beneficial  ownership of the Company's common shares by (i) each director,  (ii)
each nominee for  director,  (iii) each of the executive  officers  named in the
Summary  Compensation  Table;  (iv) all directors and executive  officers of the
Company  as a  group;  and (v) each  shareholder,  known  to  management  of the
Company,  to  beneficially  own more than five percent  (5%) of the  outstanding
common shares.

         The number and  percentage of shares  beneficially  owned is determined
under  the  rules  of the  U.S.  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,  and the
information is not necessarily  indicative of beneficial ownership for any other
purpose. Under such rules,  beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which
the individual has sole or shared voting power or investment  power and also any
shares which the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days after April
9, 2003,May 3,
2004, through the exercise of any stock option,  exchange of Exchangeable Shares
or other  right.  Unless  otherwise  indicated,  each person has sole voting and
investment  power (or shares such powers with his or her spouse) with respect to
the shares shown as beneficially owned.


Name and Number of Securities Title of Class Address of Beneficial Owner Beneficially Owned Percent of Class -NAME AND ADDRESS NUMBER OF SECURITIES TITLE OF CLASS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIALLY OWNED* PERCENT OF CLASS -------------- ------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ------------------- ---------------- Common Edmund Jaskiewicz 1730 M Street, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 2,078,155(1) 10.0%2,068,155(1) 9.7 % Common Stan Cipkowski 122 Smith Road Kinderhook, New YorkNY 12106 1,981,500(2) 9.4% Common Gerald Moore 122 Smith Road Kinderhook, New York 12106 473,000(3) 2.2%2,105,500(2) 9.6 % Common Douglas Casterlin 122 Smith Road Kinderhook, New YorkNY 12106 389,500(4)402,000(3) 1.9% Common Martin R. Gould 122 Smith Road Kinderhook, NY 12106 287,500(4) 1.3% Common Donal V. Carroll 1 Palace Pier Court, Suite 303 Toronto, Ontario Canada M8V 3W9 172,265(5) ** Common Keith E. Palmer 122 Smith Road Kinderhook, New YorkNY 12106 87,500(5) *125,000(6) ** Common D. Joseph Gersuk C/O 122 Smith Road Kinderhook, New York 12106 79,000(6) * Common Denis M. O'Donnell, M.D C/O 122 Smith Road Kinderhook, New York 12106 43,000(7) * Common Robert L. Aromando, Jr.(8) 22 Homestead Farm Road Milford, New Jersey 08848 14,000(9) * Common Dr. Gerald W. Lynch C/O 122 Smith Road Kinderhook, New York 12106 0 *Richard P. Koskey 502 Union Street Hudson, NY 12534 10,000 ** Common Daniel W. Kollin C/O 122 Smith Road Kinderhook, NY 12106 19,750(7) ** Common Anthony G Costantino C/O 122 Smith Road Kinderhook, New York 12106 0 *6,000(8) ** Common Directors and Executive Officers as a group (10(11 persons) 5,145,655(10) 23.2%5,196,170(9) 22.8%
3 _____________________________________- ---------------- * The number of shares noted for each individual is based upon information obtained from their Section 16(a) filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. ** Less than one percent (1%). 3 (1) Includes 161,500151,500 common shares subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 9, 2003.May 3, 2004. (2) Includes 488,500612,500 common shares subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 9, 2003.May 3, 2004. (3) Includes 473,000287,500 common shares subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 9, 2003.May 3, 2004. (4) Includes 275,000282,500 common shares subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 9, 2003.May 3, 2004. (5) Includes 50,000 common shares subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 9, 2003 and 12,500 common shares subject to warrants exercisable within 60 days of April 9, 2003. (6) Includes 29,000 common shares subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 9, 2003. (7)May 3, 2004. (6) Includes 43,00087,500 common shares subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 9, 2003. Dr. O'Donnell may be deemed to indirectly beneficially own 953,283May 3, 2004 and 12,500 common shares subject to the warrants owned by Seaside Partners, LP. Dr. O'Donnell is a memberexercisable within 60 days of Seaside Advisors, LLC which is the general partner of Seaside Partners, L.P. Dr. O'Donnell specifically disclaims beneficial ownership of these securities (8) Mr. Aromando resigned his position as President and CEO effective January 31, 2002. Mr. Aromando resigned as a member of the Board of Directors effective October 23, 2002. (9)May 3, 2004. (7) Includes 14,00019,750 common shares subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days of April 9, 2003. (10)May 3, 2004. (8) Includes 6,000 common shares subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days of May 3, 2004. (9) Includes an aggregate of 1,546,5001,488,750 common shares subject to stock options or warrants exercisable within 60 days of April 9, 2003. Does not include the 953,283 common shares subject to warrants beneficially owned by Seaside Partners, L.P. which Dr. O'Donnell may be deemed to indirectly beneficially own. Directors, Executive Officers and Senior Management - ---------------------------------------------------May 3, 2004. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT The following table sets forth the names, ages, positions/offices held, the term of the positions/offices held of our directors, executive officers, and senior management.
Name Age Position/Office Served Since - -----------------------------------NAME AGE POSITION/OFFICE SERVED SINCE ---- --- ------------------------------------------------------- ------------ Stan Cipkowski(1) 55 Director 1986 Edmund Jaskiewicz(1) 79 Corporate Secretary/,(2) 80 President/Director 1992 Stan Cipkowski(1) 54 ExecutiveMartin R. Gould(3) 52 CSO, Exec Vice President/Pres., Technology 1998 Donal V. Carroll 56 Director 1986 Gerald Moore(1)(2) 64 President, CEO and Chairman of the Board 1999 Douglas Casterlin 55 Executive Vice President of Operations 19972003 Keith E. Palmer 4243 CFO, Exec. Vice Pres. Finance, Treasurer 2000 D. Joseph Gersuk(1) 52Richard P. Koskey(1) 64 Director 2002 Denis M. O'Donnell, M.D.(1) 49 Director 2000 Dr. Gerald W. Lynch(1) 66 Director 20022003 Daniel W. Kollin(1) 61(4) 62 Director 2003 Martin Gould 51 Chief Scientific Officer 19982004 Anthony Costantino(1)(5) 44 Director Nominated Todd Bailey(6) 33 Vice President, Sales & Marketing 2001 Dr. Henry J. Wells, Ph.D. 7273 Vice President, of Product Development 1998
(1) Nominee for election to the Board of Directors. Biography can be found under "Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors; Nominees". (2) Mr. MooreJaskiewicz was appointed President on September 5, 2003. (3) Mr. Gould was appointed Executive Vice President on October 23, 2003. (4) Mr. Kollin previously served on the Board of Directors from February 2003 until September 2003 and CEOwas reappointed in January 2004. (5) Dr. Costantino previously served on February 1, 2002.the Company's Science Advisory Board from April 1998 until November 2003. (6) Mr. Bailey was appointed Vice President, Sales & Marketing on September 29, 2003. Information regarding those executive officers and directors that are not nominees for election to the Board of Directors: Douglas Casterlin joined us in 1997 as our Vice President and General Manager and became our Executive Vice President of Operations in May 2001. From 1979 to 1997, Mr. Casterlin was General Manager of Coarc, Inc., our former product assembling, packaging and shipping contractor. In that capacity, he developed a contract manufacturing business involving plastic injection molding and clean room assembly and packaging of FDA - regulated medical products. He also negotiated a joint venture with a major German healthcare product manufacture to establish its United States operations and established a professional-format videocassette re-manufacturing business serving the television broadcast industry. From 1976 to 1979, Mr. Casterlin was Workshop Director, Putnam Industries, Inc., and Production Manager, from 1973 to 1976, of 4 Occupatics, Inc. From 1966 to 1970, Mr. Casterlin served as an Air Force Intelligence Officer and was honorably discharged as Sergeant. He studied Engineering at Lehigh University from 1965 to 1966 and received his B.A. degree in Psychology in 1973 from the State University of New York at New Paltz. KeithKEITH E. PalmerPALMER joined us in October 2000 as our Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.Treasurer and will serve as a member of our Board of Directors from October 2003 until June 2004. He is a Certified Public Accountant with over 1520 years experience in accounting, finance, strategic planning, and merger and acquisitions. From 1998 until joining us, Mr. Palmer was Director of Finance and Controller of Matthew Bender, a division of Lexis Publishing, a legal publisher. At Matthew Bender he was responsible for management of financial reporting and analysis, accounting and control, strategic planning and numerous Finance and Operational integration efforts. From 1993 until 1998, he was the Director of Finance & Controller for Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Times Mirror Corp. During that time he spearheaded the acquisition and/or integration, and assumed responsibility for financial reporting and analysis, of four businesses, including Shepard's, a legal citations publisher in Colorado Springs, Co., Capsoft, an electronic legal forms software firm in Provo, Utah, Mosby Medical Publishing in St. Louis, Missouri, and Michie, a legal publisher in Charlottesville, VA. In addition to integrating financial and operational functions, Mr. Palmer assisted on the integration and implementations of several financial, manufacturing and fulfillment systems, during this time. Prior to joining Matthew Bender, he was a Vice President of Marine Midland Bank, a commercial bank, and from 1983 until 1987, he was an auditor and senior consultant at the public accounting firm of Ernst & Whinney. Palmer received his MBA in Finance from Sage Colleges in 1995 and his BBA in Accounting from Siena College in 1983. Information regarding members of senior management that are not nominees for election to the Board of Directors: Martin Gould4 MARTIN GOULD joined us in 1998. He was appointed our Executive Vice President, Technology in 2003 and currently also services as our Chief Science Officer (he was promoted to Chief Scientific Officer in 2002 (he formerly2002). Prior to becoming our CSO, he was our Vice President of Technology).Technology. Mr. Gould is a biomedical scientist with more than 2430 years of experience in the diagnostic and chemical fields. He has an extensive background in research and development, manufacturing, quality control/assurance, as well as business development and sales and marketing. His experience is in the areas of clinical chemistry, serology, immunology, hematology, dyes and stains, chromatography, reagent chemical and food diagnostics, specifically rapid microbiological testing. From 1973 to 1987, Mr. Gould worked for E. Merck, Inc. in various positions of increasing responsibilities within the product management, research and development, and quality assurance/control departments. In 1987, he founded Ampcor Diagnostics, Inc., which he grew until 1994 when it was acquired by Neogen Corp. (NASDAQ:NEOG). Mr. Gould continued to serve as Vice President and General Manager of Neogen Corp. until 1997. Mr. Gould was an independent consultant after leaving Neogen Corp. in 1997 until joining us in 1998. Mr. Gould is an accomplished researcher with numerous publications in a variety of fields, including rapid immunoassay tests to detect food pathogens such as e-coli, salmonella, listeria, shigella, and campylobacter. Mr. Gould established a patent in composition for stabilization of diagnostics reagents, three separate patents for immunoassay diagnostics kits, as well as a patent concerning a growth media that resuscitates injured bacteria, such as salmonella, that was recently issued. Mr. Gould received a Masters in Biomedical Science and Biomedical Engineering from Drexel University in 1982, and a BS degree from Delaware Valley College in 1973. HenryDONAL V. CARROLL was appointed to our Board of Directors in June 2003 will serve as a member of the Board until June 2004. He was appointed CEO in October 2003 and subsequently removed from the office in January 2004. Mr. Carroll has founded and developed several finance and wholesale merchandising companies during the past 30 years. Donal Carroll graduated from University College of Dublin with a degree in law and established the largest civil rights defense practice in Ireland. He also founded Celtic Marine Investments and Family Homes Finance which was subsequently incorporated into the Irish Permanent Building Society. He holds directorships in Redbrook Holdings, Redbrook Management and Fortius Capital. Information regarding members of senior management that are not nominees for election to the Board of Directors: TODD BAILEY joined us in April 2001 as a Director of Business Development and subsequently promoted to Director of National Accounts. In September 2003, he was appointed Vice President of Sales & Marketing. Prior to joining us, Mr. Bailey was Substance Abuse Account Manager for Roche Diagnostics Corporation where he was responsible for territory sales of point-of-collection tests for drugs of abuse to Fortune 500 manufacturers and state agencies. From March 1994 through July 1999, he held various sales and management positions with Paxar, Hunt-Wesson, and Frito-Lay Inc. Mr. Bailey received a B.S. in communications from St. Cloud University in 1994. 5 HENRY J. Wells, Ph.D.WELLS, PH.D. joined us as a contract chemist in 1995. In 1998 he became a full-time employee as our Vice President of Product Development. From 1990 to 1998, Mr.Dr. Wells worked as a contract chemist with the title of Vice President Science and Technology for New Horizons Diagnostics, Inc. where he adapted immuno-chemical technologies for detection of infectious diseases. From 1989 to 1990, he was director of production for Espro, Inc., a producer of in-vivo pesticides. From 1985 to 1989, Dr. Wells was Vice President Science and 5 Technology for Keystone Diagnostics, Inc. From 1984 to 1985, he was Director of Research and Development for Hill-Wells Research Corporation, a developer of diagnostics products. From 1981 to 1984, he was Vice President Research and Development of Hematec Corporation. From 1979 to 1981, Dr. Wells was Director of Biochemistry for Helena Laboratories. From 1973 to 1979, he was Manager of Chemical Chemistry at Smith Kline Diagnostics. Dr. Wells earned his Ph.D. in Biochemistry from the University of Pittsburgh in 1966, his M.A. from University of Pennsylvania in 1972 (honorary) and his B.S. in Chemistry from the University of Pittsburgh in 1958. Executive Compensation - ----------------------EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following table sets forth for fiscal yearyears ended December 31, 2002, the transition period ended2003 and December 31, 2001, and the fiscal year ended April 30, 2001,2002, the compensation paid by the Company to its Chief Executive Officer(s) and any other executive officers who earned in excess of $100,000 (the "Named Officers") based on salary and bonus. Summary Compensation Table
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE Long Term Compensation ------------ Annual Compensation Awards ------------------- ------------ Other Annual Securities Underlying Name and Principal Compensation Underlying Position Year Salary ($) Bonus ($) Compensation ($) Options/SARs (#) - ----------------------------- ------------- ---------- ----------- ------------- ---------------- Gerald A. Moore(1)Keith E. Palmer 12/31/03 $135,000(1) $10,000 $ 0 50,000 Chief Financial Officer 12/31/02 $165,000(2)$124,615(2) $ 0 $18,000(3) 810,000 Chief Executive Officer Stan Cipkowski 12/31/02 $190,764(4) $ 0 $45,000(5) 300,0003,750(3) ----------- Executive Vice President Finance Douglas Casterlin(4) 12/31/01(6) $130,769(7)03 $145,384(5) $10,000 $ 0 $ 6,000(8) ------ 4/30/01 $200,000 $ 0 ------ 100,000 Douglas Casterlin----------- Executive Vice-President 12/31/02 $140,000 $ 0 $ 5,250(8) ------ Executive Vice-President5,250(3) ----------- Operations Martin R. Gould(6) 12/31/01(6) $ 91,538(9)03 $109,154(7) $ 0 $ 6,000(8) ------ Operations 4/30/01 $140,000 $ 0 ------ 200,000 Keith E. Palmer150,000 Chief Science Officer Executive Vice President Technology Stan Cipkowski(8) 12/31/02 $124,615(10)03 $186,923(9) $ 0 $ 3,750(8) ------ Chief Financial Officer0 ----------- Executive Vice President 12/31/01(6) $ 69,539(11)02 $190,764 $ 0 $ 6,000(8) ------ Executive Vice 4/30/0145,000(10) 300,000 Donal V. Carroll(11) 12/31/03 $ 56,000(12)32,000(12) $ 0 ------ 100,000 President Finance Robert L. Aromando(13)$ 3,000(13) 329,000 Chief Executive Officer Gerald A. Moore(14) 12/31/0203 $170,000(15) $10,000 $ 17,294(14) $ 0 ------ ------7,500(3) 75,000(16) Chief Executive Officer 12/31/01(6) $117,692(15)02 $165,000(17) $ 0 $ 6,000(8) ------ 4/30/0118,000(18) 810,000(16) Robert L. Aromando(19) 12/31/02 $ 28,000(16)17,294(20) $ 25,000(17) ------ 300,000(18)
(1) Mr. Moore was appointed President and0 ----------- ----------- Chief Executive Officer effective February 1, 2002 at an 6 (1) Mr. Palmer's actual annual salary in 2003 was $130,000. The additional amount in this figure is due to timing of $180,000. In January 2002, Mr. Moore acted aspay periods within the interim President and CEO and was compensated $15,000 for his services.year. (2) As of the date of this report, $50,000 of Mr. Moore's salary for the Year-End December 31, 2002 has been deferred upon mutual agreement by and between Mr. Moore and the Company. (3) Other compensation consists of $15,000 Mr. Moore received as compensation for his services as interim President & CEO for the month of January 2002 and $3,000 in a car allowance. (4) In July 2002, Mr. Cipkowski'sPalmer's annual salary was decreasedincreased to $180,000$130,000 from $200,000.$120,000. (3) Car allowance. (4) Mr. Casterlin subsequently resigned as the Company's Executive Vice President in January 2004. (5) Mr. Casterlin's actual annual salary in 2003 was $140,000. The additional amount in this figure is due to timing of pay periods within the year. (6) Mr. Gould was appointed Executive Vice President in October 2003. (7) Mr. Gould's actual annual salary through August 2003 was $102,000. It was increased in September 2003 to $114,000. (8) Mr. Cipkowski resigned from his position of Executive Vice President in July 2003. (9) Mr. Cipkowski's actual annual salary is $180,000. The additional amount in this figure is due to timing of pay periods within the year. (10) Includes a car allowance of $3,000 and the forgiveness of accrued interest on a loan provided to Mr. Cipkowski by the Company, of $42,000 (See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions"). 6 (6) Year end 12/31/01(11) Mr. Carroll was a transition period. Salary, bonus, other compensationappointed CEO in October 2003 and long-term compensation noted forsubsequently removed from the year-end 12/31/01position of CEO in January 2004. (12) The Company has not yet paid this amount to Mr. Carroll however it has been accrued on the books of the Company. (13) This amount is for Mr. Carroll's attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors as an eight-month period beginning May 1, 2001independent board member, before he was appointed CEO. (14) Mr. Moore resigned as the Company's Chairman, President and ending December 31, 2001. Where required, a footnote has been added to note the named officer'sCEO in September 2003 and was paid for his services through August 2003. (15) Mr. Moore's actual annual salary. (7)salary in 2003 was $180,000. Mr. Cipkowski'sMoore was paid through August 2003. This amount also includes $50,000 that was paid to Mr. Moore in 2003 for a portion of his 2002 salary that was deferred. (16) These option grants were subsequently cancelled by the company in September 2003. (17) Mr. Moore's actual annual salary was $200,000. (8) Car$180,000 in 2002. $50,000 of Mr. Moore's salary in 2002 was deferred upon mutual agreement with the Company. (see footnote 15), therefore actual salary payments to Mr. Moore in 2002 were $115,000. (18) Other compensation consists of $15,000 Mr. Moore received as compensation for his services as interim President & CEO for the month of January 2002 and $3,000 in a car allowance. (9) Mr. Casterlin's actual annual salary was $140,000. (10) In July 2002, Mr. Palmer's annual salary was increased to $130,000 from $120,000. (11) Mr. Palmer's actual annual salary was $120,000. (12) Mr. Palmer was hired by the Company on October 1, 2000. His actual annual salary was $120,000. (13)(19) Mr. Aromando resigned as the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer effective& CEO in January 31, 2002. (14)(20) Mr. Aromando was paid as the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer& CEO through January 31, 20022003 in connection with his severance agreement. (15) Mr. Aromando's actual annual salary was $180,000. (16) Mr. Aromando was hired by the Company on February 26, 2001 at an annual salary of $180,000. (17) Sign-on bonus. (18) Upon Mr. Aromando's resignation as President and CEO on JanuaryOPTION GRANTS IN FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, the options granted in the year-ending April 30, 2001 were cancelled by the Company. Option Grants in Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002 - ----------------------------------------------------2003 The following table sets forth information concerning the grant of stock options to the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.2003. 7
Individual Grants ----------------- Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Number ofINDIVIDUAL GRANTS POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUE AT ASSUMED ANNUAL RATES OF NUMBER OF % of Total Annual Rates of Shares Options Stock Price Underlying Granted to Exercise Appreciation Options Employees Price Per Expiration for Option Term(1) Name Granted in Year(2) Share DateOF TOTAL STOCK PRICE SHARES OPTIONS GRANTED EXERCISE APPRECIATION UNDERLYING TO EMPLOYEES IN PRICE PER FOR OPTION TERM(1) NAME OPTIONS GRANTED YEAR(2) SHARE EXPIRATION DATE 5% 10% ---- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- ------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gerald A. Moore 10,000(3) 0.7% $0.91 2/12/12Moore(3) 75,000(4) 7.0% $1.04 4/23/13(5) $ 5,70048,750 $ 14,500 750,000(4) 55.9% $0.91 2/12/12 $417,500 $1,087,500 50,000(5) 3.7% $0.91 4/29/12 $ 28,500 $ 72,500124,500 Stan Cipkowski 100,000(6) 7.5% $1.11 7/11/12 $ 70,000 $ 177,000 200,000(7) 14.9% $1.03 10/24/12 $130,000 $ 328,000 Douglas CasterlinCipkowski(6) 0 0% ----- ----- ----- ------------ --------- ---------- --------- Douglas Casterlin(7) 0 0% ------- ---------- ---------- --------- Keith E. Palmer 0 0% ----- ----- ----- ----- Robert L. Aromando(8) 0 0% ----- ----- ----- -----50,000(8) 4.6% $1.04 4/23/13 $ 32,500 $ 83,000 Donal V. Carroll(9) 29,000(10) 2.7% $1.03 6/30/13 $ 18,850 $ 47,560 300,000(11) 27.8% $1.15 10/23/13 $ 216,000 $ 549,000 Martin R. Gould(12) 100,000) 9.3% $1.02 4/22/13 $ 64,000 $ 163,000 50,000[13] 4.6% $1.04 4/23/13 $ 32,500 $ 83,000
(1) Potential realizable value is based on an assumption that the price of the common shares appreciates at the annual rate shown (compounded annually) from the date of grant until the end of the option term. These numbers are calculated based on the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not reflect the Company's estimate of future stock price performance. (2) The Company granted options representing 1,340,5001,078,500 common shares to employees in the year end December 31, 2002.2003. (3) 100% of option grant becomes exercisableMr. Moore resigned as the Company's Chairman, President & CEO on 2/12/03.September 5, 2003. (4) Option grant vestsgrants vested over 34 years (i.e. 33%, 33%, 34%) beginning 2/12/25% each year on the anniversary of the grant date of 4/24/03). (5) Option grant was subsequently cancelled by the Company on 9/11/03. (5)(6) Mr. Cipkowski resigned as Executive Vice President on July 1, 2003. (7) Mr. Casterlin resigned as Executive Vice President on January 30, 2004. (8) Option grant vests over 4 years (i.e. 25% each year) beginninganniversary of 4/29/23/03). (9) Mr. Carroll was removed from the office of CEO on January 21, 2004. (10) Option granted in connection with Mr. Carroll's services as a member of the Board of Directors. Option grant vests 100% on the 1 year anniversary of June 30, 2003. (11) Entire option grant was subsequently cancelled by the Company upon Mr. Carroll's removal as CEO. (12) Mr. Gould was appointed Executive Vice President, Technology on 10/23/03. (6)(13) Option grant vests over 34 years (i.e. 33%, 33%, 34%) beginning 7/11/03. (7) Option grant vests over 3 years (i.e. 33%, 33%, 34%) beginning 10/24/03. (8) Mr. Aromando resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer effective January25% each anniversary of 4/23/03). AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISE IN THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002. 7 Aggregated Option Exercise in the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002 and Fiscal Year-End Option Values2003 AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES The following table sets forth information concerning the exercise of stock options during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20022003 by the named executive officers, and their options outstanding at fiscal year end. 8
Aggregate Option/AGGREGATE OPTION/SAR Exercises in Fiscal Year and TP-End Option/EXERCISES IN FISCAL YEAR AND TP-END OPTION/SAR Values - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------VALUES Number of Securities Underlying Value of Unexercised Shares Unexercised Options/SARs at In-the Money Options/SARs TPY-EndAcquired on Value FY-End (#) at TP-EndFY-End ($) -------------------------------- ------------------------- Shares Acquired on Value(1) Name Exercise (#) Realized ($) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable - ------------------------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------- ----------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gerald A. MooreMoore(2) 0 $ 0 203,000 810,000 $56,310 $267,300-----------(3) -----------(3) --------- --------- Stan CipkowskiCipkowski(4) 0 $ 0 463,500 375,000587,500 251,000 $ 9,75077,850 $ 84,250127,150 Douglas CasterlinCasterlin(4) 0 $ 0 262,500 37,500275,000 25,000 $ 4,87515,000 $ 14,62515,000 Keith E. Palmer 0 $ 0 25,000 75,00050,000 100,000 $ 6,00030,000 $ 19,500 Robert L. Aromando(2)55,000 Donal V. Carroll(6) 0 $ 0 14,0000 329,000(7) $ 0 $ 131,790(8) Martin R. Gould(9) 0 $ 0 145,000 215,000 $ 014,350 $ 113,250
(1) Value of Unexercised In-The-Money Options at Fiscal Year End is calculated by using the high sale price of the common shares on December 31, 2002,2003, which was $1.24,$1.54, less the exercise price of the in-the-money exercisable options which is then multiplied by the number of common shares covered under the option(s). (2) Mr. AromandoMoore resigned as Chairman, President & ChiefCEO on September 5, 2003. (3) Any and all options previously granted to Mr. Moore in both his role as a Director and Chairman, President & CEO were cancelled by the Company. (i.e. 615,000 were cancelled on 9/11/03 and 473,000 were cancelled on 12/3/03). (4) Mr. Cipkowski resigned as Executive Officer effectiveVice President on July 1, 2003. (5) Mr. Casterlin resigned as Executive Vice President on January 31, 2002. Compensation30, 2004 (6) Mr. Carroll was removed from the office of Directors - -------------------------CEO on January 21, 2004. (7) Of this amount, 300,000 were subsequently cancelled by the Company on January 30, 2004 as a result of Mr. Carroll's removal as CEO. (8) Of this amount, $117,000 is related to the 300,000 options that were cancelled by the Company on January 30, 2004 as a result of Mr. Carroll's removal as CEO. (9) Mr. Gould was appointed Executive Vice President, Technology on October 23, 2003. COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS Directors who are not employees or officers of the Company ("Outside Directors") are granted an option to purchase 25,000 common shares at the time of election (such initial option grant is pro-rated in consideration of the amount of time a Director would serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders) and are granted an additional option to purchase 25,000 common shares annually on the date of the Company's Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All options granted to Outside Directors are issued with exercise prices based on the fair market value of the Company's common shares on the date of issuance. Outside Directors receive a fee of $1,500 for attending meetings of the Board in person and $750 for attendance at telephonic meetings of the Board, and are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending such meetings. Special meetings are held from time to time to consider matters for which approval of the Board of Directors is desirable or is required by law. Four regular meetings of the Board of Directors and two special meetings were held during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.2003. Dr. Gerald W. Lynch attended 50%66% of the meetings held during the period for which he was a director, Denis M. O'Donnell, M.D. attended 75%60% of the meetings held, Gerald Moore attended 80%of the meetings held during the period for which he was a director and the remaining members attended 100% of all meetings held in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.2003. 9 Those outside directors who are members of one of the two committeesCompany's Compensation and/or Audit Committees of the Board of Directors are granted an option to purchase 2,000 common shares upon their election to each Committee (such initial option grant is pro-rated in consideration of the amount of time a Director would serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and are granted an additional option to purchase 2,000 common shares annually on the date of the Company's Annual Meeting of Shareholders, for each committee on which they serve. COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Company currently has an Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and a Nominating Committee. The Company's Option Committee is a sub-committee of the Compensation Committee. 8NOMINATING COMMITTEE The Nominating Committee currently consists of two members, both of whom are independent. Members of the Nominating Committee are Richard P. Koskey and Daniel W. Kollin. The nominating committee is governed by a charter it has adopted, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B to this proxy statement. The purpose of the Nominating Committee is to review, and make recommendations related to, qualified candidates for election to the Board of Directors. Nominations may be made by any member of the Board of Directors, or by any shareholder entitled to vote for the election of directors. Nominations made by shareholders for the next Annual Meeting must be made in writing and received by the Company by January 14, 2005. There was one meeting held by the Nominating Committee in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and action was taken with unanimous consent on one occasion in fiscal 2003. The following functions are among the key duties and responsibilities of the nominating committee: o evaluating candidates for membership on the Board; o recommending to the full Board all nominees for election to the Board by our shareholders; and o recommending directors to be elected by the Board to fill vacancies on the Board. In carrying out its function to evaluate and recommend nominees for election to the Board, the nominating committee considers a candidate's mix of skills, experience, character, commitment and diversity of background, all in the context of the requirements of the Board at that point in time. Each candidate should be prepared to participate fully in Board activities, including attendance at, and active participation in, meetings of the Board, and not have other personal or professional commitments that would, in the nominating committee's judgment, interfere with or limit such candidate's ability to do so. Additionally, in determining whether to recommend a director for re-election, the nominating committee also considers the director's past attendance at Board and committee meetings and participation in and contributions to the activities of the Board. The nominating committee has no stated specific, minimum qualifications that must be met by a candidate for a position on our Board. The nominating committee does, however, believe it appropriate for at least one member of the Board to meet the criteria for an "audit committee financial expert" as defined by SEC rules, and for a majority of the members of the Board meet the definition of "independent director" within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq listing standards. The nominating committee's methods for identifying candidates for election to the Board (other than those proposed by the Company's shareholders, as discussed below) include the solicitation of ideas for possible candidates from a number of sources, including: members of the Board; our executives; individuals personally known to the members of the Board; and other research. The nominating committee also has authority to select and compensate a third-party search firm to help identify candidates, if it deems it advisable to do so. 10 Audit Committee.The nominating committee will consider nominees shareholders recommend. Shareholders may submit nominations to the nominating committee in care of Corporate Secretary, American Bio Medica Corporation, 122 Smith Road, Kinderhook, NY 12106. To be timely for consideration at our next Annual Meeting of Shareholder, our Corporate Secretary must receive a shareholder's nomination notice at our principal executive offices, at the address set forth above, no later than January 14, 2005. The nominating committee will consider all candidates identified through the processes described above, whether identified by the committee or by a shareholder, and will evaluate each of them on the same basis. AUDIT COMMITTEE This Committee makes recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to the Company's financial statements and the appointment of independent auditors, reviews significant audit and accounting policies and practices, meets with the Company's independent public accountants concerning, among other things, the scope of audits and reports, and reviews the performance of the overall accounting and financial controls of the Company. The Audit Committee formally met three2 times and informally met several times in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.2003. The Audit Committee charter requires four Audit Committee meeting per fiscal year. All of the members attended 100% of the formal meetings of the Audit Committee. TheAs of the date of this report, the Audit Committee is comprised of threetwo members, both of which a majoritywhom are independent directors, (as independence is defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") listing standards, as applicable and as may be modified or supplemented), as required by Rule 4350(d)(2)(c) of the NASD listing standards. While the Company is currently not in compliance with the requirements under Rule 4350(d)(2), the Company is relying on Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(d)(4)(b), which provides for a cure period for the Company to regain compliance with the Audit Committee composition requirements. As of December 31, 2002,the date of this report, members of the Audit Committee were D. Joseph Gersuk, Edmund Jaskiewicz,Richard P. Koskey and Denis M. O'Donnell, M.D. Mr. Gersuk and Dr. O'Donnell are the independent directors on the Audit Committee.Daniel W. Kollin. The Audit CommitteeBoard of Directors has adopted a writtenan Audit Committee charter, which was previously filed as an Exhibit A to the Company's Proxy Statement filed on August 27, 2001 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee ReportCharter was amended in April 2004 and the revised charter is attached to this Proxy Statement as Exhibit A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT The Audit Committee is presently comprised of Messrs. Koskey and Kollin, both of whom are independent as defined in the applicable rules of the Nasdaq Small Cap Market. The Board has determined that Mr. Koskey is a financial expert as the term is defined under Item 401(e)(1) of Regulation S-B. AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT The Audit Committee reviews the Company's financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process. The Company's independent auditors are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company's audited financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles.principles upon completion of their audit. 11 In this context, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and the independent auditors the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20022003 (the "Audited Financial Statements"). The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU ss. 380) as may be modified or supplemented. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountants required by Independence Standards Board Standard No.1 (Independence Standards Board Standard No.1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), as may be modified and supplemented, and has discussed with the independent accountants their independence from the Company and its management. Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Audited Financial Statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002,2003, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee members do not serve as professional accountants or auditors and their functions are not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management and the independent auditors. The Committee serves a board-level oversight role where it receives information from, consults with and provides its views and directions to, management and the independent auditors on the basis of the information it receives and the experience of its members in business, financial and accounting matters. The Audit Committee D. Joseph Gersuk Edmund Jaskiewicz Denis M. O'Donnell, M.D. 9 Compensation and Option Committees.Richard P. Koskey, Chairman Daniel W. Kollin COMPENSATION AND OPTION COMMITTEES The Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board of Directors relating to salaries, bonuses and other compensation and benefits of executive officers, reviews and advises management regarding benefits and other terms and conditions of compensation of management, and the Company's Option Committee administers the Company's stock option plans. Both the Compensation and Option Committees met two timesone time in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.2003. All of the members attended 100% of the meetings held by the Compensation Committee. As of December 31, 2002,the date of this report, the Compensation and Option Committees were comprised of Chairman Gerald A. Moore andindependent board members D. Joseph GersukRichard P. Koskey and Denis M. O'Donnell, M.D. Mr. Moore served as the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. Compensation Committee's ReportDaniel W. Kollin. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE'S REPORT The compensation of the Company's executive officers and key managers ("executives") is reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Directors. In addition to reviewing and approving executives' salaries and bonus arrangements, the Compensation Committee establishes policies and guidelines for other benefits. Compensation Policies and Procedures Applicable to Executives for the fiscal year ended DecemberCOMPENSATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO EXECUTIVES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002.2003 General. Compensation of the Company's executives is intended to attract, retain and reward persons who are essential to the corporate enterprise. The fundamental policy of the Company's executive compensation program is to offer competitive compensation to executives that appropriately rewards the individual executive's contribution to corporate performance. The Compensation Committee utilizes subjective criteria for evaluation of individual performance and relies substantially on the executives in doing so. The Committee focuses on two primary components of the Company's executive compensation program, each of which is intended to reflect individual and corporate performance: base salary compensation and long-term incentive compensation. 12 Cash Compensation. Executives' base salaries are determined primarily by reference to compensation packages for similarly situated executives of companies of similar size or in comparable lines of business with which the Company expects to compete for executive talent and with reference to the revenues, gross profits and other financial criteria of the Company. The Committee also assesses subjective qualitative factors to discern a particular executive's relative value to the corporate enterprise in establishing base salaries. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002,2003, the salariessalary of the three named executive officers and the Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer werewas established in theirhis employment agreements.agreement. Long-Term Incentive Compensation. It is the Committee's philosophy that significant stock ownership by management creates a powerful incentive for executives to build long-term shareholder value. Accordingly, the Committee believes that an integral component of executive compensation is the award of equity-based compensation, which is intended to align executives' long-term interests with those of the Company's shareholders. Awards of stock options to executives have historically been at then-current market prices. The Committee believes that option grants should be considered on an annual basis. The Company's Fiscal 1997, 1998, 2000 and 2001 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plans (the "Option Plans") authorize the Board, Compensation or Option Committee to grant nonstatutory stock options to employees, directors and/or consultants of the Company. The Committee will determine the prices and terms at which such options are granted. The Committee uses stock options as a 10 significant element of the compensation package of executives, because it believes options provide an incentive to executives to maximize shareholder value and because they compensate executives only to the extent that the Company's shareholders receive a return on their investment. In determining the total number of common shares to be covered by option grants to executives in a given year, the Committee will take into account the number of outstanding common shares, the number of common shares reserved for issuance under the Company's Option Plans, recommendations of management concerning option grants to employees below executive level and the Company's projected hiring needs for the coming year. In making individual stock option grants to executives, the Committee will consider the same factors considered in the determination of base salary levels, as well as the stock and option holdings of each executive and the remaining vesting schedule of such executive's options. Compensation of the CEO. In reviewing and approving Mr. Moore'sCarroll's compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002,2003, the Board of Directors considered the same criteria detailed herein with respect to executives in general. Mr. Moore'sCarroll's base annual salary was established in his employment agreement of May 1, 2002 at $180,000, which is below the midpoint of base compensation for CEOs of comparable companies. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. MooreCarroll was granted stock options covering 800,000300,000 common shares that vest over time. Mr. Moore is also eligible to receive cash bonuses and additional stock options based upon achieving certain sales and profitability objectives (a copy Mr. Moore's Employment Agreement is filed as an exhibitSubsequent to the Company's Form 10-KSB for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2002).2003, Mr. Carroll was removed from the office of Chief Executive Officer in January 2004, and all options granted to him as Chief Executive Officer were subsequently cancelled and returned to the option plan under which they were issued. Other Executive Management Compensation. Mr. Cipkowski, Mr. CasterlinKeith E. Palmer, the Company's Chief Financial Officer and Mr. Palmer have allExecutive Vice President of Finance, has entered into an employment agreementsagreement with the Company dated January 10, 2001 and ending April 30, 2002, and automatically renewed unless 60 days advance written notice is given by either side. Pursuant to these employment agreements, Stan Cipkowski, Executive Vice President, originally received an annual base salary of $200,000, a stock option grant covering 100,000 common shares that vest over time and, is eligible for bonuses based upon Company performance.this agreement, Mr. Cipkowski's annual base salary was decreased to $180,000 in July of 2002 upon mutual agreement between the Company and Mr. Cipkowski. Douglas Casterlin, Executive Vice President of Operations, receives an annual base salary of $140,000, a stock option grant covering 50,000 common shares that vest over time and is eligible for bonuses based upon Company performance. Keith E. Palmer Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Finance, originally received an annual base salary of $100,000, a stock option grant covering 100,000 common shares that vest over time and, is eligible for bonuses based upon Company performance. Mr. Palmer's annual base salary was increased to $130,000 in July of 2002 upon mutual agreement between the Company and Mr. Palmer. Martin R. Gould, the Company's Chief Science Officer and Executive Vice President of Technology is currently an at-will employee and receives an annual salary of $114,000 (Mr. Gould's annual salary was increased in September 2003 from $102,000 to $114,000). The Compensation Committee Gerald A. Moore D. Joseph Gersuk Denis M. O'Donnell, M.D. Nominating Committee - -------------------- At a regular board meeting held on February 5, 2003,Richard P. Koskey Daniel W. Kollin 13 COMMUNICATIONS WITH DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES Shareholders may communicate with members of the Company's Board of Directors unanimously agreedand its Committees by writing to establish a Nominating Committee.American Bio Medica Corporation, 122 Smith Road, Kinderhook, New York 12106, Attn: Corporate Secretary. The Nominating Committee consists of all independent directors. Members ofCorporate Secretary will disseminate the Nominating Committee are D. Joseph Gersuk, Denis M. O'Donnell, M.D. and Daniel W. Kollin. The purpose of the Nominating Committee is to review, and make recommendations related to, qualified candidates for electioncommunication(s) to the Board of Directors. Nominations may be made by the Board of Directors, or by any shareholder entitled to vote for the election of directors. Nominations made by shareholders for the next Annual Meeting must be made in writing and received by the Company by December 20, 2003. There were no meetings held by the Nominating Committee in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as it was not yet established. 11 Independent Accountants - -----------------------appropriate individual(s). INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS The Company has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to continue to be its independent public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to attend the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement and/or to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders. On October 2, 2001, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the discharge of Eisner LLP (formerly Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP) as the Company's independent auditors and the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent auditors. There were no disagreements with the prior auditors on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures. The prior auditors' report on the registrant's financial statements for each of the two years in the period ended April 30, 2001 contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and was not modified or qualified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. However, their report contained explanatory language regarding the uncertainty of the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company filed a current report on Form 8-K regarding this matter on October 9, 2001 and it is incorporated herein by reference. Audit fees - ----------AUDIT FEES The aggregate fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to the Company throughin the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements for the transition period ended December 31, 2001 and the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 were $52,900. The aggregate fees billed for the review of the financial statements included in the Company's Quarterly Reports on FormsForm 10-QSB, or services that were normally provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for thethese fiscal year ended December 31, 2002years, were $18,000. The aggregate fees$94,150and $106,550, respectively. AUDIT RELATED FEES There were no Audit Related Fees billed by EisnerPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to the Company through December 31, 2002, for professional services rendered in relation to the inclusion of their audit of the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2001 in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the transition periodyears ended December 31, 20012003 and the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 were $27,496. Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees - ------------------------------------------------------------ The Company did not incur any fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for professional services rendered for information technology services relating to financial information systems design and implementation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. The Company did not incur any fees billed by Eisner LLP for professional services rendered for information technology services related to financial information systems design and implementation for the transition period ending December 31, 2002. All Other Fees - -------------- The aggregate fees billed through December 31, 2002 by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for services rendered to the Company for review of the S-3 Registration Statement filed by the Company on September 26, 2001 and its subsequent amendments were $11,400.TAX FEES The aggregate fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to the Company in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 for professional services related to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were $19,011 and $11,705, respectively. These fees were for services related to the preparation and filing of the Company's tax returnsreturns. ALL OTHER FEES There were $11,705.no Other Fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002. There were no other fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for services rendered to the Company other than the services described herein and above under "Audit Fees" and "Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees", Thethe Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of these services is compatible with maintaining the independence of our public accountants. 12 The aggregate fees billed through December 31, 2002 by Eisner LLP for services renderedPursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(i), prior to the Company for reviewengagement of the S-3 Registration Statement filedan independent public accountant by the Company on September 26, 2001 and its subsequent amendments were $11,687. The aggregate fees billed by Eisner LLP for preparation of tax returns were $1,135. There were no other fees billed by Eisner LLP forto render audit or non-audit services, rendered to the Company other than the services described herein and above under "Audit Fees" and "Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees", for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. TheCompany's Audit Committee has considered whetherapproves the provisionengagement. All of thesesuch services is compatible with maintaining the independence of our former public accountants. Performance Graph - -----------------performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC were so approved. 14 PERFORMANCE GRAPH The following graph compares the cumulative total return for the periods indicated for each of (a) the Company's common shares, (b) the Standard & Poors 500 Stock Index (the "S&P 500") and (c) the NASDAQ Medical Device Index. Performance Graph [OBJECT OMITTED] PSC S&P 500 Composite Dow Jones Utilities ------ ----------------- ------------------- 1997 100.00 100.00 100.00 1998 137.83 128.57 118.88 1999 99.49 155.57 111.72 2000 152.20 141.42 168.43 2001 179.47 124.59 124.18 2002 163.18 97.05 95.14
12/31/99 12/31/00 12/31/01 12/31/2002 12/31/2003 -------- -------- -------- ---------- ---------- S&P 500 $100.00 $ 91.11 $ 80.36 $ 62.55 $ 80.51 Nasdaq Medical Device Index $100.00 $103.16 $113.14 $ 91.70 $135.61 American Bio Medica Corporation $100.00 $ 38.93 $ 77.33 $108.44 $134.22
PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS The Directors elected at the Annual Meeting will serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors are elected and qualified. NOMINEES - -------- Edmund JaskiewiczEDMUND JASKIEWICZ has been one of our directors since 1992.1992 and was appointed President in September 2003. Mr. Jaskiewicz is a lawyer-engineer. He has practiced international patent and corporate law as a sole practitioner since 1963, and served as our Chairman of 13 the Board of Directors from 1992 until 1999. He currently serves as our Secretary. From 1953 to 1963, Mr. Jaskiewicz was associated with Toulmin and Toulmin, Attorneys-at-Law, Washington, D.C. From 1960 to 1962, he resided in Frankfurt, Germany managing that firm's local office. From 1952 to 1953 he was with the Patent Section of the Bureau of Ordinance of the Department of the Navy working on patent infringement and licensing matters. He received his J.D. in 1952 from George Washington University Law School and his B.S. in Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 1947. Stan CipkowskiSTAN CIPKOWSKI founded our predecessor in 1982 and1982. He has been an executive officer and onea member of our directorsBoard of Directors since our incorporation in April 1986.1986 and was one of our executive officers until July 2003, and is currently an employee of the Company. He reorganized the Company as American Bio Medica Corporation in 1992 and is the inventor of the Rapid Drug Screen(R). From 1982 to 1986, he was sole proprietor of American Micro Media, our predecessor, which was acquired by the Company. In addition, from 1983 to 1987, Mr. Cipkowski was a general partner of Florida Micro Media, a Fort Lauderdale-based marketer of educational software and was a principal shareholder and Chief Financial Officer of Southeast Communications Group, Inc., a publisher of direct response media. In 1982, he was a consultant to Dialogue Systems, Inc., a New York-based developer of training and communications materials, where he served as Vice-President of Sales and Marketing. From 1977 to 1982, Mr. Cipkowski was employed by Prentice-Hall Publishing Company, reaching the position of National Sales Manager. Prior to 1977 he was employed as an accountant for the New Seabury Corporation and as Mid-West Area Manager for the Howard Johnson Company. Mr. Cipkowski attended Mater Christi Seminary and St. Louis University from 1965 to 1969. Mr. Cipkowski is currently a member of the Board of Directors of Premier Mortgage Resources, Inc. (OTCBB: PMRS.OB) Gerald A. Moore has been one of our directors since May 1999 and became our Chairman of the Board of Directors in October 2001. In February 2001, Mr. Moore became our President and Chief Executive Officer; replacing Robert L. Aromando, Jr. Mr. Moore served as President and CEO of Med-Ox Diagnostics of Canada and President of BioSys, Inc. from 1999 to 2001. From 1990 to 1998, Mr. Moore(OTCPK: PMRS.PK) 15 DANIEL W. KOLLIN was President of UNIPATH (North America) when he reached parent company Unilever's mandatory retirement age. Brooke Bond, Inc took a majority equity position in Med-Ox in 1978 and renamed it Oxoid. In 1980, Mr. Moore opened Oxoid US in Columbus, Maryland and was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of both Oxoid CANADA and Oxoid USA. Unilever acquired all of Oxoid International's holdings and subsidiaries in 1984 and changed its name to UNIPATH in 1990. Mr. Moore is a member of the Board of Directors of the Canadian Assoc. of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (CACMID); a Director of the Canadian Clinical Standards Organization, serves on the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), a member of the NCCLS Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility testing and Veterinary Diagnostics, is an advisor to the NCCLS Committee on Culture Media, and is a liaison to the Board of Exhibitors of the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) of the American Society of Microbiology. Mr. Moore received his degree in chemistry and mathematics from Strathclyde University in Glasgow, Scotland in 1961. D. Joseph Gersuk joined our Board of Directors in February 2002. He served as Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Treasurer of MapInfo Corporation (NASDAQ:MAPS), a software data and services company, from November 1994 through March 2003. Prior to MapInfo, he was CFO and a director of DataEase Sapphire International Inc., a PC database software company. He also served as vice president and Chief Financial Officer of Staveley NDT Technologies Inc., a measurement and testing company. Mr. Gersuk is a graduate of the United States Naval Academy and holds an MBA in Finance from The American University. Denis M. O'Donnell, M.D. has served as one of our directors since May 2000 and is currently a Managing Director of Seaside Partners, L.P., the firm that purchased $2,000,000 of our common shares in a private placement on April 28, 2000. Since 1986, Dr. O'Donnell has been a Clinical Instructor of Health Science at Northeastern University. From 1984 to 1985 he was a Resident in 14 Surgery at Tufts New England Medical Center. From 1986 to 1991 he served a Director of the Clinical Research Center of Medical and Technical Research Associates, Inc. From 1991 through 1995 he was Vice President of IGI, Inc. From 1995 until 1997 he was President of Novavax, Inc., a company in which he still holds the seat of Chairman of the Board. In addition to the Novavax, Inc. board seat, Dr. O'Donnell is currently a director of ELXSI Corporation (NASDAQ:ELXS), Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (AMEX:COB), Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. (OTCBB:MCDG.OB) and is also a Fellow of the College of Clinical Pharmacology. He has written and contributed to numerous medical manuscripts, abstracts, and papers. Dr. O'Donnell graduated from Harvard University (A.B./Biology) in 1976 and from AUC Medical School (M.D.) in 1984. Dr. Gerald W. Lynch was electedre-appointed to our Board of Directors in July 2002. Since 1977, Dr. Lynch hasJanuary 2004. He previously served as the President of John Jay College of Criminal Justice. An internationally known expert and advocate of criminal justice education, Dr. Lynch has lectured at the Ecole Nationale Superieure de Police in Lyon, France; the Police Staff College in Bramshill, England; St. Petersburg University, Russia; as well as at schools and conferences in Abu Dhabi, Australia, South Africa, Canada, Brazil, Spain, Hungary, Ireland, Mexico, Israel, Italy and Germany. He earned his doctorate in clinical psychology from New York University, and is a vice chairman of the New York City Police Foundation, and the chairman of The New York Fire Safety Foundation. Daniel W. Kollin was elected toon our Board of Directors from February 2003 until he resigned in FebruarySeptember 2003. Since 1990, Mr. Kollin has been Managing Director of BioMed Capital Group, Ltd. He has over 20 years experience in investment banking, venture capital and corporate management. Prior to joining BioMed Capital Group, Mr. Kollin was Vice President, Health Care Group for Prudential-Bache Capital Funding from 1987 to 1990. Prior to 1987, Mr. Kollin was a partner of Whale Securities Corp. He received his MBA from The Wharton School of The University of Pennsylvania. He currently serves on the Board of Directors of IsoTis Orthobiologics (TORONTO:ISO). RICHARD P. KOSKEY was appointed to our Board of Directors in October 2003. Mr. Koskey brings over 30 years of financial experience as a Certified Public Accountant. Since, 1975, he has been a managing principal of Pattison, Koskey, Howe & Bucci, P.C., a regional accounting firm. Mr. Koskey received his B.A. from Duke University in 1963. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Hudson River Bank & Trust (NASDAQ:HRBT). ANTHONY G. COSTANTINO, PH.D. Since September 2002, he has served as Vice President, Laboratory Operations for National Medical Services, Inc. From September 1991 until August 2002, he held various positions within American Medical Laboratories, Inc., with the most recent being Sr. Vice President and Director until August 2002. Dr. Costantino received his Ph.D., in Forensic Toxicology from the University of Maryland, School of Medicine in 1991, his M.S. in Pharmacology/Toxicology, from Duquesne University in 1984 and his B.S. in Pharmacy from Duquesne University in 1983. Dr. Costantino sits on the Board of Directors of the Society of Forensic Toxicology. He has authored and co-authored a number of publications, abstracts and presentations in the clinical chemistry and toxicology fields since 1986 through the present. It is the intention of the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy, unless instructed otherwise, to vote for the persons nominated by the Board of Directors. If any nominee should become unavailable to serve, the proxy may be voted for the election of such substitute nominee as may be designated by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable to serve if elected. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. PROPOSAL NO. 2 - TO RATIFY THE REAPPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003. The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders of the Company vote in favor of ratifying the reappointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent auditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will continue to audit our financial statements and perform other additional accounting services that we may require. An affirmative vote of the majority shares represented at the Annual Meeting is necessary to ratify the reappointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. There is no legal requirement for submitting this proposal to the shareholders; however, the Board of Directors believes that it is of sufficient importance to seek ratification. Even if the Proposal is defeated, the Board may continue to retain PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Likewise, even if the Proposal is approved, the Board may discharge PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. 15 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE REAPPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance - -------------------------------------------------------SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Section 16(a) of the 1934 Act requires the Company's executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company's equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. 16 Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company during,as of the date of this report, in January 2004 Donal V. Carroll, the Company's former CEO and a current Director, failed to file a Form 4, containing one transaction, with respectthe SEC on a timely basis. Based solely upon the copies of such forms furnished to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002,Company, as of the date of this report, Mr. Carroll has still failed to file this report. Based upon this same review of copies of such forms furnished to the Company, believes that duringas of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, itsdate of this report, all other executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial ownersholders have complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements. Certain RelationshipsCERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, the Company paid an aggregate of $63,000 in fees to Edmund Jaskiewicz, the Company's President and Related Transactions - ----------------------------------------------a member of the Board of Directors, in consideration of his services as patent and trademark counsel to the Company. During fiscal 1999, 2000 and the first quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company advanced funds to Stan Cipkowski, the Company's former President and one of its directors. Mr. Cipkowski was the Company's Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer until January 2001.2001 and an Executive Vice President of the Company until July 2003. These advances were partially evidenced by a note and beared interest at the rate of 11.5% per annum. The loan was payable on demand. Each quarter, interest accrued on the loan was added to the outstanding principal balance of the loan. Mr. Cipkowski pledged 1,000,000 of the Company's common shares to the Company as collateral. On November 30, 2000, the Company's Board of Directors and Mr. Cipkowski agreed to a structured repayment of this loan through the regular periodic redemption by the Company of common shares owned by Mr. Cipkowski. Under the program, Mr. Cipkowski redeemed at least 25,000 common shares, after the release of financial results each quarter, with the value determined by the closing price of the common shares on the second business day following the release of the quarterly or annual financial results. Mr. Cipkowski also retained the right to redeem a greater number of common shares each quarter. In October 2002, the Board of Directors agreed to accept 200,000 shares of stock from Mr. Cipkowski in full satisfaction of the then outstanding loan balance of $248,000. The closing stock price on the date of surrender was $1.03 resulting in the forgiveness of accrued interest totaling $42,000, including $30,000 in 2002 and $12,000 from prior periods. During the fiscal 2002 the Company sold 175,000 treasury shares for $235,000. The remaining 225,000 shares surrendered were sold in fiscal 2003 for $280,000. The Company does not intend to make any additional loans to Mr. Cipkowski. The Company had collateralized a bank loan aggregating $100,000 as of December 31, 2001 for Mr. Cipkowski with certificates of deposit aggregating $106,027. In May 2002, Mr. Cipkowski paid the bank loan in full thereby releasing the certificate of deposit. In July 2001, the outstanding amounts due on a collateralized credit card were paid, the account closed and all restrictions on a $27,000 certificate of deposit released. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002,2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Altius Marketing related to marketing services. The Chief Financial Officer of Altius Marketing is the son of the Company's former Chief Executive Officer, Donal V. Carroll. The Company paid an aggregate of $64,906$13, 300 in fees to Edmund Jaskiewicz, a member of the Board of Directors, in consideration of his services as patent and trademark counsel to the Company. 16fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. 17 Other Matters - -------------OTHER MATTERS The Board of Directors is not aware of any matter to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than the matters set forth herein. Should any other matter requiring a vote of shareholders arise, the proxies confer upon the person or persons entitled to vote the shares represented by such proxies the authority to vote the proxies in their discretion. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS /s/ Edmund M. Jaskiewicz ------------------------ Edmund M. Jaskiewicz/S/ MELISSA A. DECKER Melissa A. Decker Corporate Secretary toMay 12, 2004 18 AMERICAN BIO MEDICA CORPORATION EXHIBIT A AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER (As amended April 2004) The Audit Committee ("the Committee"), of the Board of Directors April 9, 2003 17 PROXY ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS For Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002 AMERICAN BIO MEDICA CORPORATION THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CORPORATION The undersigned shareholder("the Board") of American Bio Medica Corporation having received ("the Notice dated April 9, 2003,Company"), will have the oversight responsibility, authority and specific duties as described below. COMPOSITION The Committee will be comprised of three or more directors as determined by the Board each of whom will: (i) be independent as defined under Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15), except as provided in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350)(d)(2)(B)(i); (ii) meet the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act (subject to the exemptions provided in Rule 10A-3(c); (iii) not have participated in the preparation of the Annual Meetingfinancial statements of Shareholders, hereby nominates, constitutes, appointsthe Company or any current subsidiary of the Company at any time during the last three years; and authorizes Gerald Moore(iv) be able to read and Edmund Jaskiewicz,understand fundamental financial statements, including the Company's balance sheet, income statement, and eachcash flow statement. Of the members of themthe Committee, one member will be a "financial expert" thereby having past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or any other comparable experience or background which results in the member's financial sophistication, including being or having been a chief executive officer, chief financial officer or other senior officer with full powerfinancial oversight responsibilities. One of the members of the Committee will be elected Committee Chair by the Board. RESPONSIBILITY The Committee is a part of the Board. The Committee is directly responsible for: (a) the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the Company's independent public accounting firm (including resolution of disagreements between management and the auditor regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Company, and the Company's independent public accounting firm reports directly to act alone,Committee; (b) assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to (i) the annual financial information to be provided to shareholders and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); (ii) the system of internal controls that management has established; and (iii) the internal and external audit process. (c) providing an avenue for communication between internal audit, if any, the independent auditors, financial management and the Board. (d) pre-approving all auditing services and permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) to be performed for the Company by its independent auditors, subject to the de minimus exceptions for non-audit services described in Section 10A of the Exchange Act. AUTHORITY The Committee is granted the authority to investigate any matter or activity involving financial accounting and financial reporting, as proxieswell as the internal controls of the Company. In that regard, the Committee will have the authority to establish procedures for: (a) the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters; and (b) the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. The Committee shall also have the authority to engage independent counsel and other advisers, as it determines necessary to carry out its duties. All employees will be directed to cooperate with full powerrespect thereto as requested by members of substitution,the Committee. FUNDING The Company must provide appropriate funding for meAudit Committee functions, as determined by the Committee, for payment of: (a) Compensation to any independent public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Company; (b) Compensation to any advisers employed by the Committee; and (c) Ordinary administrative expenses of the Committee that are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties. MEETINGS The Committee is to meet at least four times annually and as many additional times as the Committee deems necessary. The Committee may meet in separate executive sessions and in my name, placesessions with the chief financial officer, independent auditors and stead, to vote all the common sharesinternal auditors, if any, at other times when considered appropriate. These meetings can be held via a telephone conference. The Committee Chair shall keep minutes of said corporation standing in my name on its books on April 21, 2003, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholderseach Audit Committee meeting. ATTENDANCE Committee members will strive to be heldpresent at 10:00 A.M. on Wednesday, June 18, 2003 atall meetings. As necessary or desirable, the Marriott Hotel, 189 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12205, or at any adjournments thereof, with all the power the undersigned would possess if personally present, as follows: 1. The electionCommittee Chair may request that members of management and representatives of the seven (7) nominees listedindependent auditors and internal audit, if any, be present at Committee meetings. 2 SPECIFIC DUTIES In carrying out its oversight responsibilities, the Committee will, to the extent it deems necessary: 1. Review and reassess the adequacy of this charter annually and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval. This should be done in compliance with applicable NASD/AMEX Audit Committee Requirements. 2. Review with the Proxy StatementCompany's management, internal audit, if any, and independent auditors the Company's accounting and financial reporting controls. 3. Review with the Company's management, internal audit, if any, and independent auditors significant accounting and reporting principles, practices and procedures applied by the Company in preparing its financial statements. Discuss with the independent auditors their judgments about the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company's accounting principles used in financial reporting. 4. Review the scope of internal audit's, if any, work plan for the Annual Meeting as directors to serve untilyear and receive a summary report of major findings by internal auditors and how management is addressing the next Annual Meetingconditions reported. 5. Review the scope and until their successors are elected. IF YOU WISH YOUR VOTES TO BE CAST FOR ALL OF THE seven (7) NOMINEES LISTED BELOW, PLACE AN "X" IN THIS BOX [ ] IF YOU DO NOT WISH TO VOTE FOR ALL OF THE NOMINEES, LINE OUT THE NAMES OF PERSONS FOR WHOM YOU DO NOT CHOOSE TO VOTE: DIRECTORS: Edmund Jaskiewicz Stan Cipkowski Gerald A. Moore D. Joseph Gersuk Denis M. O'Donnell, M.D. Dr. Gerald W. Lynch Daniel W. Kollin 2. Ratificationgeneral extent of the reappointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP asindependent auditors' annual audit. The Committee's review should include an explanation from the independent auditors of the factors considered by the accountants in determining the audit scope, including the major risk factors. The independent auditors should confirm to the Committee that no limitations have been placed on the scope or nature of their audit procedures. The Committee will review annually with management the fee arrangement with the independent auditors. 6. Inquire as to the independence of the independent auditors and obtain from the independent auditors, at least annually, a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the independent auditors and the Company as contemplated by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees. 7. Have a predetermined arrangement with the independent auditors that they will advise the Committee through its Chair and management of the Company of any matters identified through procedures followed for interim quarterly financial statements, and that such notification is to be made prior to the fiscalrelated press release or, if not practicable, prior to filing Forms 10-QSB. 8. At the completion of the annual audit, review with management, internal audit, if any, and the independent auditors the following: - The annual financial statements and related footnotes and financial information to be included in the Company's annual report to shareholders and on Form 10-KSB. 3 - Results of the audit of the financial statements and the related report thereon and, if applicable, a report on changes during the year ended December 31, 2003. FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN [ ] 3. Uponin accounting principles and their application. - Significant changes to the audit plan, if any, and any serious disputes or difficulties with management encountered during the audit. Inquire about the cooperation received by the independent auditors during their audit, including access to all requested records, data and information. Inquire of the independent auditors whether there have been any disagreements with management that, if not satisfactorily resolved, would have caused them to issue a nonstandard report on the Company's financial statements. - Other communications as required to be communicated by the independent auditors by Statement of Auditing Standards (SAS) 61 as amended by SAS 90 relating to the conduct of the audit. Further, receive a written communication provided by the independent auditors concerning their judgment about the quality of the Company's accounting principles, as outlined in SAS 61 as amended by SAS 90, and that they concur with management's representation concerning audit adjustments. - If deemed appropriate after such review and discussion, recommend to the Board that the financial statements be included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB. 9. After preparation by management and review by internal audit, if any, and independent auditors, approve the report required under SEC rules to be included in the Company's annual proxy statement. The charter is to be published as an appendix to the proxy statement every three years. 10. Discuss with the independent auditors the quality of the Company's financial and accounting personnel. Also, elicit the comments of management regarding the responsiveness of the independent auditors to the Company's needs. 11. Meet with management, internal audit,y, and the independent auditors to discuss any relevant significant recommendations that the independent auditors may have, particularly those characterized as `material' or `serious'. Typically, such recommendations will be presented by the independent auditors in the form of a Letter of Comments and Recommendations to the Committee. The Committee should review responses of management to the Letter of Comments and Recommendations from the independent auditors and receive follow-up reports on action taken concerning the aforementioned recommendations. 12. Review the appointment and replacement of the senior internal audit executive, if any. 13. Review with management, internal audit, if any, and the independent auditors the methods used to establish and monitor the Company's policies with respect to unethical or illegal activities by Company employees that may have a material impact on the financial statements. 14. Generally, as part of the review of the annual financial statements, receive an oral report(s), at least annually, from the Company's general counsel concerning legal and regulatory matters that may have a material impact on the financial statements. 15. As the Committee may deem appropriate, obtain, weigh and consider expert advice as to Audit Committee related rules of the NASD/AMEX, Statements on Auditing Standards and other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof. THIS PROXY CONFERS AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL IN ITEM 2 AND FOR ALL OF THE SEVEN NOMINEES LISTED EVEN THOUGH THE BLOCK IN ITEM 1 IS NOT MARKED UNLESS THE NAMES OF ONE OR MORE PERSONS ARE LINED OUT. IF ANY OTHER BUSINESS IS PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, THIS PROXY SHALL BE VOTED IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS.accounting, legal and regulatory provisions. 4 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE COST OF SAME IS BORNE BY THE CORPORATION. THIS PROXY MAY BE REVOKED BY WRITING TO THE SECRETARY TO THE BOARD, AMERICAN BIO MEDICA CORPORATION 122 SMITH ROAD, KINDERHOOK, NEW YORK 12106 OR IN PERSON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO ITS EXERCISE. Date: _______________________________________ Name: _______________________________________ Beneficial Shareholder (Please Print) Address: _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ Signature(s) _______________________________________ _______________________________________ (All Shareholders must sign) NUMBER OF SHAREHOLDERS VOTING _________________________ IF SHARES ARE NOT REGISTERED IN YOUR NAME, PLEASE GIVE THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PERSON OR ENTITY IN WHOSE NAME THEY ARE REGISTERED. _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ (This mustEXHIBIT B Nominating Committee Charter ROLE The Nominating Committee's role is to determine director nominees for election to the Company's Board of Directors and to identify and recommend candidates to fill vacancies on the Board. MEMBERSHIP The membership of the Committee shall consist of at least two directors, each of whom shall satisfy the independence requirements of The Nasdaq Stock Market; provided, that if the Committee is comprised of at least three members, one director who does not meet the independence criteria of Nasdaq may serve on the Committee pursuant to any exception as provided under the rules of Nasdaq. Members of the Committee shall be completed if applicable) Please date, fill in your complete nameappointed by the Board. Such members shall serve at the pleasure of the Board and addressfor such term or terms as the Board may determine. OPERATIONS The Committee shall meet as often as it deems appropriate, but not less frequently than once each year to perform its duties under this Charter. The Committee will cause to be kept adequate minutes of all its proceedings, and sign above exactlywill report its actions and other matters relevant to the Committee's responsibilities to the next meeting of the Board. The Nominating Committee is governed by the same rules regarding meetings (including meetings by conference telephone or similar communications equipment), action without meetings, notice, waiver of notice, and quorum and voting requirements as your nameare applicable to the Board. The Committee is authorized to adopt its own rules of procedure not inconsistent with (a) any provision of this Charter, (b) any provision of the Bylaws or names appear hereon,Corporate Governance Guidelines of the Company, or (c) any applicable law. AUTHORITY The Committee will have the resources and return this proxy promptlyauthority necessary to discharge its duties and responsibilities, including the authority to retain outside counsel or other experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate. Any communications between the Committee and legal counsel in the enclosed envelope. When signingcourse of obtaining legal advice will be considered privileged communications of the Company and the Committee will take all necessary steps to preserve the privileged nature of those communications. RESPONSIBILITIES The principal responsibilities and functions of the Nominating Committee are as attorney, executor, administrator, trusteefollows: o Determine criteria to be used in selecting, reviewing and screening potential candidates to become Board members, taking into account all factors the Committee deems appropriate. o Assist in identifying, interviewing and recruiting candidates for the Board. o Before recommending an incumbent, replacement or guardian, please give full title. If thereadditional director, review his or her qualifications, including capability, availability to serve and other relevant factors. o Evaluate and recommend to the Board nominees for the election of directors at each annual meeting of shareholders and any applicable special meeting of shareholders. In addition, the Committee shall recommend candidates to fill vacancies or new positions on the Board, as necessary or advisable. However, if the Company is more than one fiduciary, all should sign. All joint owners must sign.at any time legally required by contract or otherwise to provide any third party with the ability to nominate a director, the Committee need not evaluate or propose such nomination, unless required by contract or requested by the Board. o Consider any nominations of director candidates validly made by shareholders. o Form and delegate responsibilities to subcommittees of the Committee, as may be necessary or appropriate. o Annually evaluate the Committee's performance and this Charter. This Charter is intended to provide a set of flexible guidelines for the effective functioning of the Committee. The Committee may recommend to the Board that the Board modify or amend this Charter and the authority and responsibilities of the Committee set forth herein at any time. 2